Analysis of Cyber Threats Targeting Industrial Control Systems
30-Page Comprehensive Report
Published: December 2024
Securing Industrial Operations
Executive Summary
Key Finding: OT-targeted cyber attacks increased 112% in 2024 compared to 2023, with ransomware, supply chain compromises, and nation-state operations representing the most significant threats to critical infrastructure.
This report analyzes the operational technology (OT) threat landscape observed during 2024, drawing on incident data from critical infrastructure operators, threat intelligence feeds, vulnerability disclosures, and OTFIELD's direct assessment experience across energy, manufacturing, water, and other industrial sectors.
2024 Threat Landscape Highlights
2,847 confirmed OT security incidents reported globally (112% increase YoY)
67% of critical infrastructure organizations experienced at least one cybersecurity incident
Average ransomware demand: $8.2M (up from $4.1M in 2023)
Mean time to detect OT intrusions: 287 days (versus 21 days for IT systems)
84% of OT environments have at least one internet-accessible control system
Supply chain attacks increased 340% with focus on industrial vendors and system integrators
Top Threat Actors
Ransomware Groups: LockBit 3.0, BlackCat/ALPHV, Royal, Play
Nation-State APTs: Volt Typhoon (China), Sandworm (Russia), Kimusky (North Korea)
Hacktivists: CyberAv3ngers, GhostSec, CyberArmy
Insiders: Disgruntled employees and contractors
Most Targeted Sectors
Energy & Utilities (37% of incidents)
Manufacturing (28%)
Water & Wastewater (14%)
Transportation (11%)
Chemical & Oil & Gas (10%)
1. Ransomware Targeting OT Environments
Ransomware remains the most prevalent and impactful threat to industrial environments, with attackers increasingly targeting OT systems directly to maximize operational disruption and extortion leverage.
2024 Statistics:
1,247 confirmed ransomware incidents affecting industrial organizations (43% of all OT incidents)
Average operational downtime: 21 days
67% of victims paid ransoms (up from 52% in 2023)
Average recovery cost: $14.7M including downtime, recovery, and ransom payments
Notable Ransomware Incidents
Manufacturing Sector Attacks
Case: Global Automotive Supplier Shutdown (March 2024)
LockBit 3.0 ransomware encrypted engineering workstations and SCADA historians at automotive parts manufacturer, disrupting production at 27 plants across 14 countries. Attackers demanded $23M ransom. Company experienced 19-day production shutdown with estimated $180M revenue impact.
Energy Sector Attacks
Case: US Electric Cooperative Incident (July 2024)
Royal ransomware deployed through compromised vendor remote access. Attackers achieved access to distribution SCADA system but were detected before encryption deployment. Incident resulted in 3-day precautionary shutdown affecting 47,000 customers.
Ransomware Evolution
OT-Aware Targeting: Ransomware groups now identify and specifically target OT assets for maximum leverage
Double and Triple Extortion: Theft of engineering data, operational data, and customer information before encryption
Living-off-the-Land: Use of legitimate IT/OT tools (PsExec, WMI, PowerShell) to avoid detection
Shorter Dwell Times: Average 4.2 days from initial access to encryption (down from 12 days in 2023)
2. Nation-State Threat Activity
Nation-state actors continued pre-positioning in critical infrastructure networks for potential future disruption, with particular focus on electricity, water, and communications infrastructure.
Critical Concern: Multiple nation-state groups maintained persistent access to US critical infrastructure throughout 2024, representing long-term strategic risk beyond immediate disruption threats.
Volt Typhoon (China)
Chinese state-sponsored group focused on pre-positioning in critical infrastructure for potential future disruption operations.
Tactics and Techniques:
Living-off-the-land techniques to evade detection
Abuse of SOHO routers and network devices to route traffic and avoid attribution
Focus on maintaining persistent access rather than immediate exploitation
Targeting of power grid, water systems, and telecommunications
2024 Activity: Identified in 34 critical infrastructure organizations across US, Canada, Australia, and UK. Average dwell time before detection: 4.7 years.
Sandworm (Russia)
Russian military intelligence (GRU) group with proven capability to disrupt industrial operations.
Historical Context: Responsible for 2015 and 2016 Ukraine power grid attacks and NotPetya destructive malware.
2024 Activity:
Reconnaissance against European energy infrastructure
Exploitation of Schneider Electric and Siemens product vulnerabilities
Testing of industrial protocol manipulation capabilities
Infrastructure development for future operational access
DPRK (North Korea) Activity
North Korean groups targeting industrial organizations primarily for financial gain through ransomware and cryptocurrency theft.
Groups: Lazarus, Kimsuky, Andariel
Focus Areas: Defense contractors, aerospace, and energy sectors with focus on intellectual property theft and revenue generation.
3. Supply Chain Compromises
Supply chain attacks increased dramatically in 2024, with threat actors targeting industrial vendors, system integrators, and managed service providers as a pathway to multiple downstream victims.
Supply Chain Attack Statistics:
287 confirmed supply chain incidents (340% increase from 2023)
Average number of downstream victims per incident: 47
Most common vectors: Compromised software updates, vendor remote access, and third-party integrations
Threat actors compromised build environment of SCADA software vendor, injecting backdoor into legitimate software updates distributed to 342 customer sites across North America and Europe. Malware provided persistent remote access to customer OT environments. Discovery occurred 7 months after initial compromise.
Impact: Remediation required coordinated response across hundreds of facilities, SCADA system shutdowns, and forensic investigations. Estimated industry-wide remediation cost: $87M.
System Integrator Breach (September 2024)
Ransomware group compromised major system integrator's internal network, stealing engineering documentation, network diagrams, and remote access credentials for 89 industrial client sites. Attackers used stolen information to target downstream victims with tailored attacks.
Software Supply Chain: Malicious updates, poisoned repositories, and compromised development tools
Third-Party Integrations: Exploitation of trust relationships between interconnected industrial systems
Cloud Service Providers: Targeting of OT-focused cloud and managed services providers
4. Vulnerabilities and Exploits
2024 saw significant increase in disclosed vulnerabilities affecting OT products, with particular concern around zero-day exploitation and vulnerabilities in widely-deployed industrial components.
Vulnerability Disclosure Statistics:
1,847 OT product vulnerabilities disclosed (28% increase YoY)
34% rated Critical (CVSS 9.0+)
67% remotely exploitable without authentication
Average time to patch availability: 127 days
Average time to patch deployment in OT environments: 387 days
CVE-2024-ZZZZ Schneider Electric Command Injection
CRITICAL
EcoStruxure products
OS command injection in web interface, widespread exploitation observed
Zero-Day Exploitation
14 confirmed cases of zero-day exploitation in OT environments during 2024, representing significant increase from 3 incidents in 2023. Exploitation primarily attributed to nation-state actors with focus on maintaining persistent access.
5. ICS Protocol Exploitation
Attackers demonstrated increasingly sophisticated understanding of industrial protocols, with capability to manipulate process behavior through protocol-level attacks.
Targeted Protocols
Modbus TCP: Man-in-the-middle attacks and command injection
DNP3: Authentication bypass and unauthorized control commands
IEC 61850: GOOSE message manipulation in electrical substations
OPC UA: Certificate validation bypasses and session hijacking
PROFINET: Network reconnaissance and device enumeration
Protocol Attack Capabilities
Publicly available tools for industrial protocol attack capabilities expanded significantly:
Protocol fuzzing frameworks for vulnerability discovery
Packet crafting tools for protocol manipulation
Man-in-the-middle attack frameworks
Protocol-specific exploit modules in Metasploit and other frameworks
6. Insider Threats
Insider threats continued to pose significant risk to industrial operations, with both malicious insiders and unintentional threats causing security incidents.
Insider Threat Statistics:
312 confirmed insider incidents (11% of all OT incidents)
62% involved current employees, 38% former employees or contractors
Most common motivations: Financial gain (42%), revenge/sabotage (31%), ideology (15%), unintentional (12%)
Average damage: $2.7M per incident
Notable Insider Incidents
Water Utility Sabotage (June 2024)
Terminated employee retained remote access credentials, modified chemical dosing parameters at water treatment plant causing temporary water quality issues. Detected through anomalous process behavior alerts. No public health impact.
Manufacturing IP Theft (October 2024)
Process engineer exfiltrated proprietary manufacturing data including PLC logic, HMI designs, and process parameters before departure to competitor. Discovery occurred through data loss prevention alerts.
Insider Threat Indicators
Access to systems outside normal job responsibilities
After-hours access without operational justification
Large data transfers or downloads
Recent performance issues or disciplinary actions
Announced departure to competitor
7. Hacktivist Activity
Hacktivist groups increased targeting of industrial infrastructure in support of political and ideological objectives, with particular focus on energy and utilities.
Active Groups
CyberAv3ngers
Pro-Iranian hacktivist group targeting water utilities and gas infrastructure. Notable for defacing HMIs of internet-exposed Unitronics PLCs at multiple US water facilities.
Tactics: Exploitation of default credentials on internet-exposed industrial devices, website defacement, and DoS attacks.
GhostSec and CyberArmy
Groups claiming politically-motivated attacks against industrial targets. Capabilities primarily limited to DDoS and defacement, though growing sophistication observed.
Hacktivist Impact Assessment
While hacktivist capabilities generally lag nation-state actors and sophisticated cybercriminal groups, they pose significant risk due to:
Unpredictability of targets and timing
Public disclosure amplifying reputational impact
Potential to inspire copycats and escalation
Exploitation of basic security weaknesses for maximum publicity
8. Attack Vectors and Initial Access
Attack Vector
% of Incidents
Description
Phishing/Social Engineering
34%
Credential theft through targeted email campaigns
Compromised Credentials
28%
Use of stolen or purchased credentials (infostealer malware, dark web)
Vulnerability Exploitation
19%
Exploitation of unpatched vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems
Supply Chain Compromise
11%
Via vendor access, software updates, or third-party services
Removable Media
5%
USB drives and other portable storage devices
Insider Threat
3%
Malicious or negligent insiders with legitimate access
9. Recommendations and Mitigations
Critical Security Controls
Priority 1: Network Segmentation
Implement zones and conduits architecture per IEC 62443 to limit lateral movement and protect critical control systems. Deploy industrial firewalls at trust boundaries with default-deny rules.
Priority 2: Secure Remote Access
Eliminate direct internet exposure of OT systems. Implement VPN with MFA, jump servers, and time-limited vendor access through isolated DMZ.
Priority 3: Credential Hardening
Change all default credentials, enforce strong passwords, implement MFA for privileged access, and deploy privileged access management (PAM).
Detection and Response
OT Network Monitoring: Deploy industrial IDS/IPS with protocol-aware inspection
Logging and SIEM: Centralized log collection and correlation across IT/OT
Backup and Recovery: Offline backups of critical configurations with tested recovery procedures
Incident Response: OT-specific IR plans with safety considerations and regular exercises
Vulnerability Management
Maintain asset inventory with software versions and patch status
Risk-based patching prioritizing critical and internet-facing systems
Compensating controls (isolation, IPS virtual patching) for unpatchable systems
Subscribe to ICS-CERT advisories and vendor security notifications
Supply Chain Security
Vendor security requirements in contracts
Regular vendor security assessments
Isolated vendor access zones with monitoring
Software supply chain verification and testing
10. 2025 Threat Predictions
Anticipated Trends
AI-Enhanced Attacks: Increased use of AI/ML for reconnaissance, social engineering, and automated exploitation
ICS-Specific Malware: Development of malware targeting specific industrial control systems and processes
Cloud and IIoT Targeting: Attacks against cloud-connected OT and Industrial IoT devices
Geopolitical Tensions: Continued nation-state pre-positioning in critical infrastructure
Emerging Threats
Quantum computing threats to industrial cryptography (planning horizon: 5-10 years)
Deepfake and AI-generated social engineering targeting OT personnel
Attacks against 5G-connected industrial systems and private 5G networks
Exploitation of convergence between IT, OT, and IoT systems
Conclusion
The 2024 OT threat landscape demonstrated continued evolution and sophistication of threats targeting industrial control systems and critical infrastructure. The 112% increase in incidents reflects both improved detection/reporting and genuine escalation of threat activity.
Organizations must adopt risk-based security programs that balance operational requirements with cybersecurity controls. This includes:
Executive leadership engagement and adequate resourcing
Cross-functional collaboration between IT, OT, engineering, and operations
Implementation of fundamental security controls (segmentation, access management, monitoring)
Incident response preparedness with OT-specific procedures
Continuous improvement through regular assessment and adaptation
The threat environment will continue to evolve in 2025, requiring ongoing vigilance and adaptation of security programs to address emerging threats while maintaining operational resilience.